STAT: Many clinical trials’ findings never get published. Here’s why that’s bad
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- January 2013
Categories
- A little bit thumb-sucky
- Accuracy and precision
- AllTrials
- AllTrials Press
- Art of Science Communication
- Asking for Evidence
- Association
- Astronomy
- Big data
- Causality
- Climate Change
- Clinical Trial Transparency
- Comparisons
- Confidence intervals
- Confidence levels
- Confounding
- Control group
- Correlation is not causation
- Data
- Data Science
- Data Sharing
- Democracy
- Demographics
- Design
- Editorial
- Epistemically Challenged
- Federal Statistics
- For the Record
- From the archives
- Government Statistics
- Graphs
- Guide for Scientists
- Hazard ratios
- History
- In the Field
- In Their Words
- Key concepts
- Margin of error
- Measurement
- Media analysis
- Meta
- Methodology
- Missing data
- Modeling
- Multiple testing
- National Statistics
- Odds ratio
- P values
- Pathways to Success
- Polls
- Precision
- Probability
- Prosecutor's fallacy
- Retraction
- Risk
- Sampling errors
- SAS USA Press
- Savvy stats reporting
- Selection bias
- Significance
- Standing up for Science
- Statistical Literacy
- Statistical modeling
- STATS Press
- STATS roundup
- Studies in the News
- Study design
- Survey design
- Uh-oh
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- UX
- Visualization
- Voice of Young Science
- Wonkywonks
- Your daily dose of fear mongering
Recent Comments